Business Ethics: A Contradiction in Terms? Part I
Business Ethics:(n) the study and examination of moral and social responsibility in relation to business practices and decision-making in business
- The Company needs to upgrade its IT infrastructure, so the IT Director puts the transaction out to tender. One of the hopefuls contacts the IT Director with a proposition: if she awards the tender to his company, he will ensure a sufficient amount of profit is built into the transaction to make the deal worthwhile to her personally. In this case The Undesirable appears clothed as an authentic respondee to valid and lawful tender. But to achieve its own ends The Undesirable unmasks itself, rapidly yet surreptitiously, to the IT Director. The outcome of this scenario hinges on the answer to one vital question: Is the IT Director, too, and unbeknownst to the Company, an Undesirable?
- The wealthy CEO of a multi-national Company receives authorisation to appoint extra security personnel at his own private estate. He personally appoints a recruitment company that works on a commission basis. In addition to a team of security guards to rival the National Defence Force, the recruiter also proceeds to appoint: a Chef, aka a nutritionist to monitor the CEO’s correct food in-take; Assistant Chef, aka the food taster to guard against the risk of food poisoning; Cleaner, aka someone to remove obstacles that may impede the CEO’s progression; Gym Instructor, aka someone to ensure the CEO’s bodily health; Personal Assistant, aka someone to relieve unnecessary burdens upon the CEO’s daily life; and Gardener, aka someone to guard against the CEO stumbling over natural vegetation. All at well above market-related remuneration, of course, for it takes an exceptional level of skill and experience to secure the health and well-being of a CEO. The Undesirable in this scenario is cloaked as the appointed recruiter. Meanwhile, the other Undesirable, the CEO, attempts to safeguard its true identity by declaring that “I didn’t ask for it” when confronted by outraged shareholders.
- A business owner with an exciting proposition approaches an investor for funding. The investor’s Financial Director offers to approve double the amount granted – provided the business owner pays half the grant into the Financial Director’s personal account against invoices for “consulting fees”. While the FD’s actions clearly reveal it to be an Undesirable, is the business owner so desperate for the funding that she is willing to sacrifice her own moral fibre by joining this perilous species of being?
- How to guard against the Company becoming embroiled in activities it regards as unsavoury; and
- If that fails, what to do about it?
(In the meantime, check out our template Business Ethics Policy. No company should be without one!)
Please note that this information is supplied for general information and does not constitute legal advice. It is advisable for you to contact a legal practitioner for guidance in respect of your unique requirements.


